#Maladolescenza watch tv#

Other reviewers, such as The Christian Science Monitor 's David Sterritt, view the film as a waypoint in the director's early development toward becoming 'a world-class filmmaker'.

#Maladolescenza watch tv#

Maitland McDonagh in TV Guide also commented on the film's curious nature in her review: 'neither cheerfully naughty nor suffused with gauzy prurience, evokes a time of turbulent (and often ugly) emotions with disquieting intensity'. Scott from The New York Times called the film 'crude, unpolished, yet curiously dreamy'. Petrakis points out that Breillat's film 'seems acutely aware of this paradox'. John Petrakis from the Chicago Tribune noted that Breillat 'has long been fascinated with the idea that women are not allowed to go through puberty in private but instead seem to be on display for all to watch, a situation that has no parallel with boys'. more nuanced and intuitive than those of most schools of psychology', and noted the film's use of a blend of dream sequences with realistic scenes.

Lisa Alspector, reviewing the film in the Chicago Reader, called the film's 'theories about sexuality and trauma. As such, Breillat has insisted that sex is the subject, not the object, of her work. to integrate this film into a commodity driven system of distribution', because it 'does not offer visual pleasure, at least not one that comes without intellectual engagement, and more importantly, rigorous self-examination'. Price argued that the film's approach is in line with Linda Williams's defense of literary pornography, which Williams describes as an 'elitist, avant-garde, intellectual, and philosophical pornography of imagination' versus the 'mundane, crass materialism of a dominant mass culture'. Д¬ritic Brian Price calls A Real Young Girl a 'transgressive look at the sexual awakening of an adolescent girl', an 'awkward film' which 'represents Breillat at her most Bataillesque, freely mingling abstract images of female genitalia, mud, and rodents into this otherwise realist account of a young girl's' coming of age. On review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes the film has a score of 71% based on reviews from 7 critics, with an average rating of 6.8/10. Though playing a 14-year-old, Charlotte Alexandra was 20 years old in real-life at the time of the film's production. This film has no closing credits instead, an instrumental version of the song 'Suis-je une petite fille' (Am I a little girl) plays over a black screen. He is then shot and killed by a trap that Alice's father set up to keep wild boar out of his maize field. She discovers her father is having an affair, and Jim tries pressuring her into having sex. She exposes herself to Jim, and the two masturbate in front of each other, to Alice's chagrin. She then arrives home and imagines seeing her father's penis. When the earthworm will not fit, Jim tears it into small pieces and puts them in Alice's pubic hair.ДЄt a carnival, a middle-aged man exposes himself to her on a ride. Alice has a graphic sexual fantasy in which Jim ties her to the ground with barbed wire and attempts to insert an earthworm into her vagina. Her father hires a young man named Jim, with whom Alice immediately becomes infatuated. She flashes back to her time at school, where she frequently masturbated out of boredom in one scene, she inserts a spoon into her vagina.

Alice Bonnard is a 14-year-old girl attending a boarding school in France who comes back to her home in the Landes forest for the summer of 1963.